Vieillissement thermique d’un jonc composite carbone/époxy. Analyse de l’endommagement et ses conséquences sur les propriétés mécaniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le vieillissement thermique d’un jonc composite carbone/époxy a été étudié dans l’air entre 160 et 220 °C par tomographie X, microscopie optique et flexion trois points. La thermo-oxydation de la matrice affecte une couche superficielle trop fine pour pouvoir altérer les propriétés mécaniques. La thermolyse de la matrice est donc le principal mode de dégradation. Elle conduit à la formation de longs microcanaux parallèles aux fibres dans les régions les plus riches en matrice du cœur du jonc. Leur multiplication et leur coalescence entraînent une chute progressive du module d’élasticité et, dès que le taux de porosité atteint une valeur critique de l’ordre de 3,6 %, une chute catastrophique de la contrainte à rupture. Sur la base de ces résultats, des équations reliant l’évolution des propriétés mécaniques à des critères d’endommagement dérivés du taux de porosité ont été établies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".