MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529352072 · doi:10.1177/2473011416s00193

Gender Differences in End-Stage Ankle Arthritis

2016· article· en· W2529352072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Dodd, Ellie Pinsker, Ryan Khan, Timothy R. Daniels

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkleAnkle replacementOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyArthritisOrthopedic surgeryArthrodesisInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: End-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA) is a debilitating disease that does not affect all individuals equally. Gender differences have been identified in patients with end-stage hip and knee arthritis and have stimulated research to explain these findings. The present study was undertaken to examine if gender has a significant effect on pre-operative disability and post- operative outcomes in patients with ESAA. Methods: Patients undergoing ankle arthrodesis (AA) or total ankle replacement (TAR) with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified in the Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society prospective ankle reconstruction database. Demographic data, revision data, patient satisfaction questionnaires, and outcome data using the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short-form 36 (SF-36) health survey were collected. Results: TAR: 384 patients were included, with 198 females and 186 males. Preoperatively females had higher rates of pain and disability, demonstrated by lower SF-36 physical component scores (PCS) (31.0 vs 34.5, p < 0.001), and higher AOS pain (54.7 vs 51.1, p=0.05) and AOS disability scores (66.5 vs 59.6, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, both groups had significant improvement in PCS, AOS pain, and AOS disability scores. Females continued to demonstrate lower PCS scores (38.3 vs 41.9, p < 0.001) and higher AOS disability scores (31.0 vs 25.8, p=0.02) than males. Preoperative PCS, gender, age, and arthritis etiology all had a significant impact on postoperative PCS scores, with preoperative PCS scores having the largest impact. Gender had no significant impact on AOS pain and disability scores postoperatively. AA: Results Pending Conclusion: In patients with ESAA, females tend to have higher pre-operative levels of pain and disability compared to males, which persists post-operatively. This is consistent with the hip and knee arthroplasty literature. This finding may be due to females undergoing surgery at more advanced disease states, arthritis etiology, referral bias, or treatment bias. Both males and females have significant and similar degrees of improvement in pain and disability scores after TAR, and reoperation rates and patient satisfaction rates are similar despite the apparent disparity in outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle OrthopaedicsSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207