MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529412965 · doi:10.13111/2066-8201.2015.7.2.7

Tuning of a Wavelet Filter for Miniature Accelerometers Denoising based Joint Symbolic Dynamics (JSD) Method

2015· article· en· W2529412965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINCAS BULLETIN · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersAgenția Spațială Română
KeywordsWaveletJoint (building)Filter (signal processing)AccelerometerNoise reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceDynamics (music)Computer scienceStep detectionComputer visionAcousticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper exposes a wavelet filtering mechanism related to the noise suppression in the acceleration sensors, with direct application in the strap-down inertial navigation systems. The presented procedure is related to the actual trend in the inertial navigation field to use miniaturized inertial measurement units, which includes MEMS or NEMS sensors. Beside the already wavelet filtering used method, based on different thresholding mechanisms, the here proposed work refers to the use of an alternative tuning mechanism for the wavelet filters, based on the Joint Symbolic Dynamics (JSD) method. The main idea of the proposed method is to process and analyze signals received from the sensors in the inertial measurement unit of the navigator by using the Wavelet transform until optimal levels of decomposition are established and the useful signals are achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it