MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529412965 · doi:10.13111/2066-8201.2015.7.2.7

Tuning of a Wavelet Filter for Miniature Accelerometers Denoising based Joint Symbolic Dynamics (JSD) Method

2015· article· en· W2529412965 on OpenAlexaff
Edu Ioana Raluca, ADOCHIEI Felix Constantin

Bibliographic record

VenueINCAS BULLETIN · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersAgenția Spațială Română
KeywordsWaveletJoint (building)Filter (signal processing)AccelerometerNoise reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceDynamics (music)Computer scienceStep detectionComputer visionAcousticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper exposes a wavelet filtering mechanism related to the noise suppression in the acceleration sensors, with direct application in the strap-down inertial navigation systems. The presented procedure is related to the actual trend in the inertial navigation field to use miniaturized inertial measurement units, which includes MEMS or NEMS sensors. Beside the already wavelet filtering used method, based on different thresholding mechanisms, the here proposed work refers to the use of an alternative tuning mechanism for the wavelet filters, based on the Joint Symbolic Dynamics (JSD) method. The main idea of the proposed method is to process and analyze signals received from the sensors in the inertial measurement unit of the navigator by using the Wavelet transform until optimal levels of decomposition are established and the useful signals are achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINCAS BULLETINSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207