MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529446898 · doi:10.1002/asna.201713352

The <scp>XXL</scp> survey: First results and future

2017· article· en· W2529446898 on OpenAlex
M. Pierre, C. Adami, M. Birkinshaw, L. Chiappetti, S. Ettori, A. E. Evrard, L. Faccioli, F. Gastaldello, Paul Giles, C. Horellou, A. Iovino, E. Koulouridis, C. Lidman, A.M.C Le Brun, B. J. Maughan, S. Maurogordato, Ian G. McCarthy, Satoshi Miyazaki, F. Pacaud, S. Paltani, M. Plionis, T. H. Reiprich, T. Sadibekova, V. Smolčić, S. L. Snowden, Jean Surdej, M. Tsirou, C. Vignali, J. P. Willis, Sinan Aliş, B. Altieri, N. Baran, C. Benoist, A. Bongiorno, L. Pozzetti, A. Butler, A. Cappi, C. A. Caretta, P. Ciliegi, N. Clerc, Pier-Stefano Corasaniti, J. Coupon, J. Delhaize, I. Delvecchio, J. Démoclès, S. Desai, Julien Devriendt, Yohan Dubois, D. Eckert, A. Elyiv, Arya Farahi, C. Ferrari, S. Fotopoulou, W. Forman, I. Georgantopoulos, V. Guglielmo, Minh Huynh, N. Jerlin, C. Jones, S. Lavoie, J. P. Le Fèvre, Maggie Lieu, M. Kilbinger, F. MaruIli, A. Mantz, Sean McGee, J.‐B. Melin, О. Melnyk, L. Moscardini, Mladen Novak, E. Piconcelli, Bianca M. Poggianti, D. M. Pomarede, E. Pompei, T. J. Ponman, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, Parul Rana, David Rapetti, Somak Raychaudhury, M. Ricci, H. Röttgering, M Sahlén, J.‐L. Sauvageot, C. Schimd, M. Sereno, G. P. Smith, Keiichi Umetsu, Patrick Valageas, A. Valotti, I. Valtchanov, A. Veropalumbo, B. Ascaso, David J Barnes, M. De Petris, F. Durret, Megan Donahue, M. Ithana, M. J. Jarvis, M. Johnston‐Hollitt, E. Kalfountzou, Scott T. Kay, F. La Franca, N. Okabe, Adam Muzzin, A. Rettura, F. Ricci, J. Ridl, G. Risaliti, Motokazu Takizawa, P. Thomas, Nhut Truong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomische Nachrichten · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsCluster (spacecraft)AngstromAstronomyRedshiftCOSMIC cancer databaseCosmologyCalibrationSurvey researchGalaxyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The XXL survey currently covers two 25 deg 2 patches with XMM observations of ∼10 ks. We summarize the scientific results associated with the first release of the XXL dataset, which occurred in mid‐2016. We review several arguments for increasing the survey depth to 40 ks during the next decade of XMM operations. X‐ray ( z &lt; 2) cluster, ( z &lt; 4) active galactic nuclei ( AGN ), and cosmic background survey science will then benefit from an extraordinary data reservoir. This, combined with deep multi‐ λ observations, will lead to solid standalone cosmological constraints and provide a wealth of information on the formation and evolution of AGN , clusters, and the X‐ray background. In particular, it will offer a unique opportunity to pinpoint the z &gt; 1 cluster density. It will eventually constitute a reference study and an ideal calibration field for the upcoming eROSITA and Euclid missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it