The masticatory system of the obese: Clinical and electromyographic evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Masticatory performance is determined not only through the speed of mastication, or by the quantity of food ingested; it also depends on the structures and functional integration of the stomatognathic system (SS). OBJECTIVES: This study investigated differences in the SS and orofacial motricity between obese and normal--weight women. METHOD: A total of 18 obese women, with an average age of 28 ± 7.3 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 37.4 ± 5.1 Kg/m2, and 18 normal--weight women, with an average age of 26 ± 7.6 years and an average BMI of 20.7 ± 1.8 kg/m2, took part in the study. During the speech therapy evaluation, chewing, the number of chewing strokes, and swallowing were observed. The posture, mobility and tonus of lips and tongue, morphology, mobility and tonus of cheeks were designated as normal or altered. The electrical activity of the anterior temporalis, the masticatory muscle was evaluated for both groups using surface electromyography (EMG), which was expressed in microvolts (pV) and registered as Root Mean Squares. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the two groups in clinical evaluation. In surface EMG, the obese group showed asymmetry of electrical activity of the anterior temporalis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that speech therapist investigation of the SS should be combined with interdisciplinary obesity management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".