MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529583158

Universal approximation results for the temporal restricted Boltzmann machine and the recurrent temporal restricted Boltzmann machine

2016· article· en· W2529583158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoltzmann machineRestricted Boltzmann machineBoltzmann constantBlock (permutation group theory)Computer scienceMarkov chainDeep belief networkMathematicsArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceDeep learningMachine learningCombinatoricsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) has proved to be a powerful tool in machine
\nlearning, both on its own and as the building block for Deep Belief Networks (multi-layer
\ngenerative graphical models). The RBM and Deep Belief Network have been shown to be
\nuniversal approximators for probability distributions on binary vectors. In this paper we
\nprove several similar universal approximation results for two variations of the Restricted
\nBoltzmann Machine with time dependence, the Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machine
\n(TRBM) and the Recurrent Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RTRBM). We show
\nthat the TRBM is a universal approximator for Markov chains and generalize the theorem
\nto sequences with longer time dependence. We then prove that the RTRBM is a universal
\napproximator for stochastic processes with nite time dependence. We conclude with a
\ndiscussion on e ciency and how the constructions developed could explain some previous
\nexperimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it