MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529910900

'After Botticelli' in 'Emanations', a three person show curated by Martha Langford as part of 'Le Mois de la Photo à Montreal'.

2005· article· en· W2529910900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Butler

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Mois de la Photo à Montreal 2005 photographic biennale was curated by the critic and historian Martha Langford, founding Director of the Canadian Museum of Contemporary Photography. Under the title 'Image & Imagination', Le Mois de la Photo comprised a series of exhibitions including 30 artists from Canada, France, Japan, Haiti, Australia, the Netherlands and the US. With the title 'Image and Imagination', Langford’s intention was to emphasise that however much the photograph may be tied to the real, it takes to life in the spectator’s imagination. 'Emanations' was a show within 'Image and Imagination' in which Langford selected three artists (including myself) whose work reflected ideas of origin. My work employs photography in various ways (stills, projections) to suggest the activation of personal memory or fantasy in responding to artworks within the public space of the gallery. My piece 'After Botticelli' was a projection based on a photographic slide of a tondo painting of a Madonna and child in the National Gallery, London, where the Madonna gazes out at the spectator. In the projection a small round mirror intervenes to relay the Madonna’s face on to the ceiling where she gazes down upon the spectator. Engaging with her gaze above, the spectator’s gaze is diverted from the painting in favour of the vertical exchange of gazes between the Madonna/mother and spectator/child. The contribution made by this work to photographic art lies in the way it privileges a maternal gaze and affords a personal or psychological response in preference to typical religious or formal art historical readings. An accompanying book, entitled 'Image & Imagination', edited by Martha Langford, was published by McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal (ISBN 0-7735-2969-1). It was also published in a separate French edition (0-7735-3024-X). My work "After Botticelli' is referenced on pp.195-200 with illustrations on pp.198-99.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University)Same topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207