Exceptional trace fossil preservation and mixed layer development in Cambro-Ordovician siliciclastic strata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Instances of exceptional preservation - preservation of near-surface structures of high taphonomic fidelity, including bioglyphic detail - have been previously reported from Cambro-Ordovician trace fossil assemblages worldwide. However, it has hitherto been unknown to what extent this exceptional preservation characterises the Cambro-Ordovician record as a whole. Herein we present ichnological, sedimentological and taphonomic data collected from the Bell Island Group (Beach Formation) and Wabana Group (Powers Steps Formation, Scotia Formation, Grebes Nest Point Formation) of Canada and the Bynguano Formation of Australia, units selected as representative of Cambro-Ordovician marine shelfal settings. Additionally, data from outgroup (both lower and higher energy) facies were collected from the Barrancos Formation of Spain, the Juniata Formation of the eastern United States and the Pacoota Sandstone of Australia in order to assess the role of depositional environment in Cambro-Ordovician infaunal colonisation and exceptional preservation. The Bynguano, Beach, Powers Steps, Scotia and Grebes Nest Point formations are characterised by widespread exceptional preservation of shallow-tier ichnological assemblages and bioglyphic structures, implying formation and preservation in a cohesive substrate. In spite of the common density and complexity of trace fossil assemblages, ichnofabric is (and thus infaunal mixing was) only poorly to moderately well developed. Trace fossils are preserved as discrete structures both along bedding planes and in cross-section. Well mixed intervals are typically of limited spatial extent and composed of millimetre-scale structures resulting in limited disruption of macro-scale depositional fabrics. Bed-sole assemblages are cast onto the bases of thin (millimetre- to centimetre-scale) sandstone horizons or beds rather than penetrating through beds. Comparison with outgroup facies both confirms the limited extent of biogenic mixing across a range of Cambro-Ordovician marine settings and highlights the significance of heterolithic facies for exceptional preservation and recognition of shallow-tier assemblages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".