MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Role of Complement Components C1q and C5a in Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cell Migration.

2006· article· en· W2530064551 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Jalili, Leah A. Marquez‐Curtis, Jencet Montaño, Neeta Shirvaikar, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, Anna Janowska‐Wieczorek

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisCD34Cell biologyBiologyProgenitor cellStem cellMyeloidCord bloodComplement systemImmunologyChemotaxisClassical complement pathwayImmune systemReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The complement protein C1q primarily provides a recognition and activation signal that triggers the classical pathway of complement, but it also has multiple immune functions including acting as a chemoattractant for neutrophils, eosinophils, mast and monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Moreover, hematopoietic stem cells have recently been shown to express the C1q receptor, C1qRp. C5a also strongly chemoattracts monocyte/macrophages to inflammatory sites. Recently we showed that G-CSF mobilization activates complement by a classical IgM-dependent pathway (Blood2005;106:1976a). In this study we examined the possible roles of C1q and C5a in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) migration. We found that C5aR was expressed at the mRNA level on mobilized peripheral blood (mPB) and cord blood (CB) CD34+ cells but at the protein level only on mPB CD34+ cells. Flow cytometry revealed high C1qRp expression on both mPB and CB CD34+ cells. When the expression of C5aR and C1qRp was examined on the CB CD34+ cells expanded towards myeloid, megakaryocytic and erythroid lineages (at days 0, 3, 6, 11 and 14 of expansion), we found that C5aR expression increased with cell maturation (days 3–14) in both myeloid and megakaryocytic progenitors. In contrast, C1qRp was highly expressed on day 0, stayed constant in myeloid and megakaryocytic cells (days 3–11), and was down-regulated by day 14 in megakaryocytic cells. C1qRp was down-regulated in erythroid precursors during their maturation. We also found that C5a but not C1q is a chemoattractant for mPB CD34+ cells. In chemotaxis assays towards an SDF-1 gradient, C5a primed chemotactic responses of both mPB and CB CD34+ cells to a low (10 ng/mL) gradient of SDF-1 (up to 80% of their response to a high (200 ng/mL) SDF-1 gradient); C1q primed the chemotactic responses of both types of CD34+ cells (up to 100% of the response to a high SDF-1 gradient), and the priming effect of C1q on SDF-1-induced chemotaxis of expanded myeloid and megakaryocytic precursors decreased, consistent with down-regulation of C1qRp on these cells by day 14. Hence these results indicate that HSPC and progenitor cells express functional C5a and C1q receptors and that both the C5a-C5aR and C1q-C1qRp axes sensitize the responses of these cells to SDF-1 and thus could play a role in HSPC homing/mobilization to bone marrow. Further studies in animal models are needed to elucidate the roles of C5a and C1q in HSPC trafficking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207