MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530152826 · doi:10.1145/2872518.2889397

A Machine learning Filter for Relation Extraction

2016· article· en· W2530152826 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Lange Di Cesare, Michel Gagnon, Amal Zouaq, Ludovic Jean‐Louis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRelation (database)Relationship extractionExtraction (chemistry)Filter (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningData miningComputer visionChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TAC KBP English slot filling track is an evaluation campaign that targets the extraction of 41 pre-identified relations related to specific named entities. In this work, we present a machine learning filter whose aim is to enhance the precision of relation extractors while minimizing the impact on recall. Our approach aims at filtering relation extractors' output using a binary classifier based on a wide array of features including syntactic, lexical and statistical features. We experimented the classifier on 14 of the 18 participating systems in the TAC KBP English slot filling track 2013. The results show that our filter is able to improve the precision of the best 2013 system by nearly 20\% and improve the F1-score for 17 relations out of 33 considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207