MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A NUP98-HOX Fusion Gene Containing the Homeodomain of HOXA10 Promotes Significant Expansion of Primitive Human Hematopoietic Cells in Extended Cultures.

2006· article· en· W2530180470 on OpenAlexaff
Suzan Imren, Guy Sauvageau, Connie J. Eaves, R. Keith Humphries

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisBiologyCD34Stem cellStem cell factorMolecular biologyIn vitroFusion geneCell cultureCell biologyCancer researchImmunologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Expanding human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in vitro is a major goal in clinical hematology but remains a major challenge due to the potent differentiating activity of known cytokines. We recently demonstrated that a NUP98-HOX fusion gene containing only the homeodomain (hd) of HOXA10 (NUP98-HOXA10hd) is a powerful stimulator of murine HSC expansion in vitro - causing >1000-fold net HSC increases in 10 days (Sekulovic et al, ISEH 2005). To investigate the proliferative effect of NUP98-HOXA10hd on primitive human hematopoietic cells, highly enriched CD34+ cord blood cells were prestimulated overnight and exposed to self-inactivating MNDUSNUP98-HOXA10hd pgkGFP or control pgkGFP lentiviruses for 6h. The gene transfer efficiency into CD34+ cells determined 4 days after infection was 56 ± 5% for NUP98-HOXA10hd and 66 ± 5% for the GFP control. GFP+ cells were sorted on day 5 and then maintained for another 5 days in serum-free cultures containing Flt3-ligand, Steel factor, IL-3, IL-6 and G-CSF. An aliquot of each was then plated into “primary” colony-forming cell (CFC) assay cultures. No difference was detected in either the numbers or the types of colonies generated in these primary CFC assays of the 10-day cultured cells from the NUP98-HOXA10hd and control arms. However, when these primary CFC assays were replated into secondary CFC assays, the number of colonies obtained from the NUP98-HOXA10hd-transduced cells was 5-fold higher as compared to the GFP-control transduced cells and, upon replating into tertiary CFC assays, this difference increased to over a 100-fold. To determine the effect of NUP98-HOXA10hd on more primitive hematopoietic cells, 104 day-10 GFP+ cells were co-cultured on mouse fibroblast feeders engineered to produce human SF, IL-3 and G-SCF. At the end of 6 weeks, 13-fold more cells were recovered from the cultures initiated with NUP98-HOXA10hd-transduced cells than from the control cultures (474,000 ± 190,000 vs 37,000 ± 16,000, 3 experiments). CFC outputs were also greatly enhanced (21-fold more CFC than in the controls cultures, range=20–80, 3 experiments). Moreover, the proportion of progenitors in the assays of the cultures initiated with NUP98-HOXA10hd cells that were multi-lineage (CFU-GEMM) was >10-fold higher as compared to the CFCs obtained from the control cultures (8 ± 3% vs 0.7 ± 0.7%). When this experiment was repeated using limiting dilutions of initial day-10 cells, the frequency of NUP98-HOXA10hd-transduced cells able to generate CFCs another 6 weeks later was 10-fold higher as compared to the day-10 GFP control-transduced cells. These findings document an unprecedented potency of NUP98-HOXA10hd for stimulating the ex-vivo expansion of very primitive pluripotent human hematopoietic cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects→French-language works237,207→