MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530256457 · doi:10.22260/isarc2016/0056

Simulation of HVAC Local Control Based on Occupants Locations and Preferences

2016· article· en· W2530256457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... ISARC · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACComputer scienceControl (management)Environmental scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAir conditioningMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system consumes the major part of energy in buildings. By analyzing the gap between the actual energy consumed and the required energy to satisfy heating/cooling loads, it is estimated that an average of 38% of the energy can be saved with the adoption of more efficient control strategies. Occupancydriven management has attracted great attention due to the potential energy savings. Therefore, the development and implementation of these strategies are of primary importance. On the other hand, future smart buildings will have the ability to detect and locate the occupants, and adjust the HVAC system to better satisfy their preferences, which is expected to result in considerable energy savings. This paper aims to simulate the energy performance that can be achieved by applying local control of the HVAC system. It proposes an HVAC localized control strategy based on the locations and preferences of occupants in an office open space with multiple zones. In order to evaluate the energy saving after applying the control strategy, DesignBuilder software is used to model one office at Concordia University and simulate its energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it