ESTUDO RETROSPECTIVO DE LESÕES PEDIÁTRICAS ORAIS DIAGNOSTICADAS NA FOP-UNICAMP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoLesões orais e maxilofaciais afetando crianças são relativamente incomuns nos centros diagnósticos, contabilizando aproximadamente 10% de todas as amostras analisadas.Estudos que investigam essas lesões pediátricas em diferentes áreas geográficas são muito desejados por patologistas orais e pediatras para melhorar as habilidades de diagnóstico.O alvo deste estudo é determinar se existe uma importante diferença na incidência de lesões orais na população do sudeste brasileiro em comparação a outras regiões brasileiras e do globo.Os arquivos da divisão de patologia oral da Universidade de Campinas foram revistos retrospectivamente todos os casos afetando pacientes de 16 anos e jovens, diagnosticados de 2000 a 2014.Nossos resultados foram similares à aqueles descritos na literatura.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".