PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED, MULTICENTRED CLINICAL TRIAL ASSESSING SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF A SYNTHETIC CARTILAGE IMPLANT VERSUS FIRST METATARSOPHALANGEAL ARTHRODESIS IN ADVANCED HALLUX RIGIDUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with advanced stage hallux rigidus from 12 centers in Canada and the UK were randomized (2:1) to treatment with a small (8/10 mm) hydrogel implant (Cartiva) or 1 st MTP arthrodesis. VAS pain scale, validated outcome measures (FAAM sport scale), great toe active dorsiflexion motion, secondary procedures, radiographic assessment and safety parameters were evaluated. 236 patients were initially enrolled, 17 patients withdrew prior to randomization, 17 patients withdrew after randomization and 22 were non-randomized training patients, leaving 152 implant and 50 arthrodesis patients. Standard demographics and baseline outcomes were similar for both groups. Mean VAS pain scores decreased from 6.8 and 6.9 respectively for the implant and arthrodesis groups from baseline to 1.4 and 0.7 at 24 months. Similarly, the FAAM sports score improved significantly from baseline levels of 37 and 36 to 24 months level of 77 and 82 respectively for the implant and arthrodesis groups. First MTP active dorsiflexion motion improved an average of 4° at 3 months after implant placement and was maintained at 24 months. Secondary surgeries occurred in 17 (11.2%) implant patients and 6 (12.0%) arthrodesis patients. Fourteen (9.2%) implants were removed and converted to arthrodesis and 6 (12.0%) arthrodesis patients had painful hardware requiring removal. There was no case of implant fragmentation, wear, or bone loss. Analysis of a single composite endpoint utilizing the three primary study outcomes (pain, function, and safety) showed statistical equivalence between the2groups. Conclusion In patients requiring surgery for advanced stage hallux rigidus, treatment with a small synthetic cartilage implant resulted in comparable clinically important pain relief and functional outcomes compared to 1 st MTP arthrodesis while preserving and often improving great toe motion. Secondary surgical intervention was similar in the implant and arthrodesis groups. Revision from a small implant plug to arthrodesis can be performed if needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".