Self-Healing and Injectable Shear Thinning Hydrogels Based on Dynamic Oxaborole-Diol Covalent Cross-Linking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogels containing sugar and oxaborole residues with remarkable self-healing properties were synthesized by free-radical polymerization in a facile and one pot process. The strong covalent interactions between the oxaborole residues and free adjacent hydroxyl groups of the pendent sugar residues of the glycopolymer allowed the in situ formation of hydrogels achievable under either neutral or alkaline conditions. These hydrogels showed excellent self-healing and injectability behaviors in aqueous conditions and were found to be responsive to both pH and the presence of free sugars (such as glucose) in solution. Furthermore, these hydrogels can easily be reconstructed from their lyophilized powder into any desired three-dimensional scaffold. Additionally, the hydrogels can be designed to have very low cytotoxicity and hence can be used as a scaffold for cell encapsulation. With these unique properties, these biocompatible, biodegradable, rebuildable, and self-healable hydrogels offer great potential in many biomedical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".