Characterization of Free Radicals in Clathrate Hydrates of Furan, 2,3-Dihydrofuran, and 2,5-Dihydrofuran by Muon Spin Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to their importance as abundant hydrocarbon deposits in nature, clathrate hydrates are being studied as potential media for hydrogen and carbon dioxide storage and as "nano-reactors" for small molecules. However, little is known about the behavior of reactive species in such materials. We have employed muon spin spectroscopy to characterize various organic free radicals that reside as isolated guests in structure II clathrates. The radicals are formed by reaction of atomic muonium (Mu) with the guest molecules furan and two isomeric dihydrofurans. Muonium is essentially a light isotope of hydrogen and adds to unsaturated molecules in the same manner as H. We have determined muon and proton hyperfine coupling constants for the muoniated radicals formed in the clathrates and also in neat liquids at the same temperature. DFT calculations were used to guide the spectral assignments and distinguish between competing radical products for Mu addition to furan and 2,3-dihydrofuran. Relative signal amplitudes provide yields and thus the relative reactivities of the C4 and C5 addition sites in these molecules. Spectral features, hyperfine constants, and reactivities all indicate that the radicals do not tumble freely in the clathrate cages in the same way that they do in liquids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".