Cobayes de la relève : l’artiste et le chercheur à la rencontre de l’expérience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai se veut une réflexion préliminaire dans la foulée de la collaboration amorcée avec une artiste, Arkadi Lavoie Lachapelle, dans le cadre d’un projet interdisciplinaire sur l’art et la bioéthique. Je dirai d’abord quelques mots à propos de la conception du droit à laquelle j’adhère et des conclusions méthodologiques que j’en tire. Ces remarques serviront d’arrière-plan aux réflexions qui m’ont été inspirées par ma collaboration avec Arkadi Lavoie Lachapelle dans le cadre de ce projet. Ensuite, je m’aventurerai du côté de la critique artistique en proposant l’esquisse d’une lecture de certaines oeuvres de l’artiste. Enfin, je ferai quelques remarques réflexives touchant à mon expérience éthique de la pratique d’une méthodologie de recherche qualitative et aux rapprochements qui peuvent être faits avec la pratique artistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.060 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.044 | 0.028 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".