MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530554761 · doi:10.1037/cap0000079

A survey of clinical psychology doctoral students in Quebec.

2016· article· en· W2530554761 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Josiane Jauniaux, Dorothée Schoemaker, Jerry C. Middleton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsPublic sectorDebtHealth carePrivate sectorWagePsychologyValue (mathematics)Economic shortagePublic healthSociologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsMedicineNursingGovernment (linguistics)LawBusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent issue of Canadian Psychology dedicated to the future of psychology in Canada, a number of topics and issues were presented as opportunities, or as challenges, for psychologists (Counsell, Cribbie, & Harlow, 2016; Drapeau, Holmqvist, & Piotrowski, 2016; Hartman, Fergus, & Reid, 2016; Karesa, & McBride, 2016; Campbell et al., 2016; O'Neill, 2016). Two of the articles included in that issue addressed the working conditions of psychologists, including of psychologists in training (Roy, 2016; Votta-Bleeker, Tiessen, & Murdoch, 2016). In particular, Roy (2016) underscored that the unfair wage conditions within the public sector in Quebec contribute principally to the displacement of many psychologists from the public sector to the private sector, resulting in a significant shortage of psychologists working within the public sector in that province. Roy also admonished that the distinctive value of psychologists, compared with other health care professionals who offer psychotherapy, is not well recognized and is poorly defined both among managers in health facilities and among the general public. In a related vein, Votta-Bleeker et al. (2016) contended that, throughout Canada, student debt and a dearth of employment vacancies in the public sector are two substantive factors implicated in the precarious employment prospects for psychology graduates. Furthermore, in Quebec, the wage conditions are still not commensurate with the new doctoral training requirement to secure the title of psychologist, leaving highly qualified psychologists to face significant wage disparities in comparison with other health care professionals holding a doctoral degree (e.g., physicians, pharmacists; Roy, 2016). Even more concerning, in Quebec, compared with the rest of Canada, the internship that is part of the training to become a psychologist is currently unpaid, which creates further work strain and adds precarity to the financial portfolios of doctoral students in the applied fields of psychology.Within Quebec, since 2006, a clinical doctorate (PsyD, DPs) or a postgraduate PhD is the minimum training requirement for designation as a psychologist. Accordingly, in Quebec, the number of doctoral graduates in psychology has increased markedly by 150% between 2003 and 2010 (Service Canada, 2015). Standards associated with the training and practice of psychology in Quebec have been similarly undergoing significant changes to align with the standards of other Canadian provinces, resulting in noteworthy changes in the level of academic and clinical training of working psychologists.Nonetheless, Quebec remains the only province in Canada in which psychology internships are unpaid. In 2015, data from the Canadian Council of Professional Psychology Programs (CCPPP) demonstrated that Quebec is encountering major challenges with regard to the remuneration of internships (Canadian Council of Professional Psychology Programs [CCPPP], 2016). Comparatively across Canada, 99.6% of doctoral students in psychology complete paid internships, the average salary of which has been estimated to be $31,000. Hence, despite conforming to the highest professional and academic standards, the training conditions of future psychologists in Quebec, particularly with regard to the financial costs associated with pursuing the training to become a psychologist, remain an underdeveloped area of investigation.To gain a better understanding of the factors related to the nonremunerative nature of internships in Quebec, a sociodemographic survey of 503 clinical doctoral students in Quebec (training to become psychologists) was undertaken. Some of the questions in this survey explored the vocational intentions and career aspirations of these students. Before delving into the noteworthy findings from this survey, however, a brief overview of the academic and clinical training requirements to become a psychologist in Quebec are explicated, in addition to a brief overview of the participants for this study. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.825
GPT teacher head0.741
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207