MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530618634 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.178509

Clinical Trial with Sodium <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Pertechnetate Produced by a Medium-Energy Cyclotron: Biodistribution and Safety Assessment in Patients with Abnormal Thyroid Function

2016· article· en· W2530618634 on OpenAlexafffund
Svetlana V. Selivanova, Éric Lavallée, Helena Senta, Lyne Caouette, Alexander McEwan, Brigitte Guérin, Roger Lecomte, Éric Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersUniversity of AlbertaDivision of Materials ResearchMcMaster University
KeywordsCyclotronNuclear medicineRadiochemistryPertechnetateThyroidBiodistributionChemistryMedicineTechnetiumInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single-site prospective open-label clinical study with cyclotronproduced sodium 99m Tc-pertechnetate ( 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 ) was performed in patients with indications for a thyroid scan to demonstrate the clinical safety and diagnostic efficacy of the drug and to confirm its equivalence with conventional 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 eluted from a generator. Methods: 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 was produced from enriched 100 Mo (99.815%) with a cyclotron (24 MeV; 2 h of irradiation) or supplied by a commercial manufacturer (bulk vial eluted from a generator). Eleven patients received 325 6 29 (mean 6 SD) MBq of the cyclotron-produced 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 , whereas the age-and sex-matched controls received a comparable amount of the generator-derived tracer. Whole-body and thyroid planar images were obtained for each participant. In addition to the standard-energy window (140.5 keV 6 7.5%), data were acquired in lower-energy (117 keV 6 10%) and higher-energy (170 keV 6 10%) windows. Vital signs and hematologic and biochemical parameters were monitored before and after tracer administration. Results: Cyclotron-produced 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 showed organ and whole-body distributions identical to those of conventional 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 and was well tolerated. All images led to a clear final diagnosis. The fact that the number of counts in the higher-energy window was significantly higher for cyclotron-produced 99m Tc-NaTcO 4 did not influence image quality in the standard-energy window. Image definition in the standardenergy window with cyclotron-produced 99m Tc was equivalent to that with generator-eluted 99m Tc and had no particular features allowing discrimination between the 99m Tc production methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207