MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530654971 · doi:10.26443/ijwpc.v1i1.78

Imagine the poss-ABILITIES! Therapeutic Recreation: An Integral Aspect of Whole-Person Health Care

2014· article· en· W2530654971 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Erica Botner

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Whole Person Care · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationPsychologyContext (archaeology)HappinessDocumentationProcess (computing)Recreational therapyPublic relationsMedical educationApplied psychologySocial psychologyMedicineComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The word recreation is really a very beautiful word. It is defined in the dictionary as “the process of giving new life to something, of refreshing something, of restoring something.” This something, of course, is the whole person. (Bruno Hans Geba)Background: The purpose of Therapeutic Recreation is to enable all individuals to improve quality of life, and achieve optimal health through meaningful experiences in recreation and leisure. We believe in the inherent capacities of individuals for wellness, personal growth, happiness and freedom, with or without absence of disease. Therapeutic Recreation is a profession which provides service to, and advocates for individuals with disabilities, illnesses, and other conditions in clinical, community and educational settings. We recognize that everyone has the right to have access to and experience the healing benefits from recreation and leisure opportunities. Therapeutic Recreation follows a systematic process of developing a therapeutic relationship, assessment, goal setting, program development, implementation through individual and group facilitation, documentation and evaluation. Programs are designed based on the strengths, interests and needs of the participants and promote improving wellness within the physical, emotional, spiritual, behavioural and social domains (according to the participant and their context) and to educate individuals about the skills and resources required to participate in recreation and leisure. We use evidence-based practice to create outcome-based interventions suitable to the participant’s abilities.Content: Presentation will be descriptive, drawing attention to the profession of Therapeutic Recreation and how it fits well with the whole person approach.Evidence: Current research indicates a significant number of positive health outcomes resulting from participation in Therapeutic Recreation programs such as: improved physical, cognitive, social and emotional functioning; leisure and life skill development to enhance functional independence; self worth, and quality of life of individuals and their families; adjustment to disability and/or illness and post-traumatic growth; reduced boredom, stress, anxiety, and agitation; reduced decline in physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning and as a result reduce the need for health care services; reduced secondary disability and associated higher health care costs.Conclusion: There is strong evidence that Therapeutic Recreation interventions are healing, support wholeness, and can have a major positive impact in the outcomes of people served. Thus, Therapeutic Recreation should be an integral part of any multi-disciplinary health care team that uses a whole-person care approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Whole Person CareSame topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207