Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Industrial Derived Xylo-oligomers to Monomeric Sugars for Potential Chemical/Biofuel Production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Commercial grade, xylo-oligosaccharide-rich, water-soluble streams, obtained after hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw, were assessed for their potential as sugar feedstocks to make glycol. When acid and enzymatically based hydrolysis processes were compared, it appeared there was considerable potential to further optimize the enzymatic approach of hydrolyzing the oligomers to pure xylose. Various commercial enzyme cocktails and their synergistic cooperation were assessed over a range of combinations and hydrolysis conditions. An optimized “enzyme cocktail,” at low protein loadings, could hydrolyze more than 80% of the oligomers to xylose within 3 h. After 24 h, all of the xylo-oligomers were hydrolyzed to xylose. A moderately adjusted pH of 4.3 ensured fast and efficient hydrolysis without the need for agitation. The advantage of an enzymatic as opposed to an acid-based approach to hydrolysis was evidenced when the process was scaled up to 300 L. These include the use of a cheaper and simpler infrastructure, improved xylose recovery, and a much easier xylose purification process. This indicated the potential for further enzyme recycling and reuse, further enhancing the economic attractiveness of an enzyme-based approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".