Perinatal sexuality: An overview of women’s intimacy and sexuality during and after pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I the transition to parenthood (from the decision to have a child or conception until the baby is 2 years old), future and new parenting couples are faced with numerous intimate and sexual changes and have to adapt as best as they can. Women’s sexuality change at different levels (biological, psychological, sociological, emotional) during the 5 phases of the perinatal period: Preconception, pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and breastfeeding. However, very little attention has been given to women’s intimacy and sexuality during the transition to parenthood both in research and practice. Moreover, there is a clear dearth of research and interventions in this domain, despite women’s obvious and particular needs. This presentation has three objectives: Provide a critical review of the research studies conducted on this subject (what do we know on perinatal sexuality concerning women?); provide an overview of the interventions developed to support women (what are we doing to help those women?) and make recommendations for different levels of healthcare (what can we do as health professionals for those women?). This presentation will provide a better understanding of a sexual fundamental issue for women: Perinatal sexuality. It is part of an equity approach in population health to promote the individual, the couple, the family and the society and to promote equitable access to appropriate services and collaborative, continuous and durable care regarding sexual and reproductive health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | low |
| grok | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| opus | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 3 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".