MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530831879 · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2016.10.005

Oxidative stress predicts depressive symptom changes with omega-3 fatty acid treatment in coronary artery disease patients

2016· article· en· W2530831879 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior and Immunity · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of GuelphCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthToronto Rehabilitation InstituteSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
KeywordsMalondialdehydeInternal medicineCoronary artery diseasePolyunsaturated fatty acidOxidative stressMedicinePlaceboLipid peroxidationGastroenterologyDepression (economics)EndocrinologyFatty acidBiologyPathologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Antidepressant efficacy of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) treatment in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients remains unpredictable. N-3 PUFA can mitigate oxidative stress, which is common in CAD and may contribute to depressive symptoms. This study investigated whether greater pre-treatment oxidative stress, measured by the ratios of late-stage lipid peroxidation markers (malondialdehyde [MDA], 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal [4-HNE], and 8-isoprostane [8-ISO]) to an early-stage marker (lipid hydroperoxides [LPH]), predicted n-3 PUFA antidepressant benefits in CAD. Methods This was a secondary analysis of CAROTID (CAD Randomized Omega-3 Trial in Depression, NCT00981383). Patient demographics and medical characteristics were collected. Depressive symptoms were measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Patients were then randomized to receive either 1.9 g/day n-3 PUFA or placebo for 12 weeks, after which HAM-D scores were reassessed. Baseline LPH, 4-HNE, 8-ISO, MDA and n-3 PUFA concentrations were analysed from fasting blood. Results Seventy-nine patients (age = 61.1 ± 8.5, 76% male, HAM-D = 7.5 ± 6.1) were included (n = 45 placebo, n = 34 n-3 PUFA). In the n-3 PUFA group, higher baseline ratios of MDA/LPH (primary analysis: F 1,33 = 6.20, beta = −0.35, p = 0.018), 4-HNE/LPH (exploratory analysis: F 1,33 = 5.35, beta = −0.32, p = 0.027), and 8-ISO/LPH (exploratory analysis: F 1,33 = 6.10, beta = −0.33, p = 0.019), indicating higher oxidative stress, were associated with greater depressive symptom improvement. In each model, higher baseline EPA + DHA concentrations independently predicted depressive symptom improvement with n-3 PUFA (MDA/LPH: F 1,33 = 11.05, p = 0.002; 4-HNE/LPH: F 1,33 = 11.36, p = 0.002; 8-ISO/LPH: F 1,33 = 13.15, p = 0.001). No associations were observed in the placebo group. Conclusions n-3 PUFA may be more likely to improve depressive symptoms in CAD patients with pre-treatment evidence of oxidative stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it