MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530831879 · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2016.10.005

Oxidative stress predicts depressive symptom changes with omega-3 fatty acid treatment in coronary artery disease patients

2016· article· en· W2530831879 on OpenAlexafffund
Graham Mazereeuw, Nathan Herrmann, Ana C. Andreazza, Gustavo Scola, David W.L., Paul Oh, Krista L. Lanctôt

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior and Immunity · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of GuelphCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthToronto Rehabilitation InstituteSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
KeywordsMalondialdehydeInternal medicineCoronary artery diseasePolyunsaturated fatty acidOxidative stressMedicinePlaceboLipid peroxidationGastroenterologyDepression (economics)EndocrinologyFatty acidBiologyPathologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Antidepressant efficacy of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) treatment in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients remains unpredictable. N-3 PUFA can mitigate oxidative stress, which is common in CAD and may contribute to depressive symptoms. This study investigated whether greater pre-treatment oxidative stress, measured by the ratios of late-stage lipid peroxidation markers (malondialdehyde [MDA], 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal [4-HNE], and 8-isoprostane [8-ISO]) to an early-stage marker (lipid hydroperoxides [LPH]), predicted n-3 PUFA antidepressant benefits in CAD. Methods This was a secondary analysis of CAROTID (CAD Randomized Omega-3 Trial in Depression, NCT00981383). Patient demographics and medical characteristics were collected. Depressive symptoms were measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Patients were then randomized to receive either 1.9 g/day n-3 PUFA or placebo for 12 weeks, after which HAM-D scores were reassessed. Baseline LPH, 4-HNE, 8-ISO, MDA and n-3 PUFA concentrations were analysed from fasting blood. Results Seventy-nine patients (age = 61.1 ± 8.5, 76% male, HAM-D = 7.5 ± 6.1) were included (n = 45 placebo, n = 34 n-3 PUFA). In the n-3 PUFA group, higher baseline ratios of MDA/LPH (primary analysis: F 1,33 = 6.20, beta = −0.35, p = 0.018), 4-HNE/LPH (exploratory analysis: F 1,33 = 5.35, beta = −0.32, p = 0.027), and 8-ISO/LPH (exploratory analysis: F 1,33 = 6.10, beta = −0.33, p = 0.019), indicating higher oxidative stress, were associated with greater depressive symptom improvement. In each model, higher baseline EPA + DHA concentrations independently predicted depressive symptom improvement with n-3 PUFA (MDA/LPH: F 1,33 = 11.05, p = 0.002; 4-HNE/LPH: F 1,33 = 11.36, p = 0.002; 8-ISO/LPH: F 1,33 = 13.15, p = 0.001). No associations were observed in the placebo group. Conclusions n-3 PUFA may be more likely to improve depressive symptoms in CAD patients with pre-treatment evidence of oxidative stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Behavior and ImmunitySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207