MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530840403 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2016-009-0

Rings in which Every Element is a Sum of Two Tripotents

2016· article· en· W2530840403 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsElement (criminal law)Product (mathematics)Zero (linguistics)ExponentIdempotenceOrder (exchange)Identity (music)GeometryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let R be a ring. The following results are proved. (1) Every element of R is a sum of an idempotent and a tripotent that commute if and only if R has the identity x 6 = x 4 if and only if R ≅ R 1 × R 2 , where R 1 / J ( 2 1 ) is Boolean with U ( R 1 ) a group of exponent 2 and R 2 is zero or a subdirect product of ℤ 3 ’s. (2) Every element of R is either a sum or a difference of two commuting idempotents if and only if R ≅ R 1 × R 2 , where R 1 / J ( R 1 ) is Boolean with J ( R 1 ) = 0 or J ( R 1 ) = {0, 2} and R 2 is zero or a subdirect product of ℤ 3 ’s. (3) Every element of R is a sum of two commuting tripotents if and only if R ≅ R 1 × R 2 × R 3 , where R 1 / J ( R 1 ) is Boolean with U ( R 1 ) a group of exponent 2, R 2 is zero or a subdirect product of ℤ 3 ’s, and R 3 is zero or a subdirect product of ℤ 5 ’s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it