MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530874672 · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa9756

A higher rank Racah algebra and the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mstyle> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mstyle> </mml:math> Laplace–Dunkl operator

2017· article· en· W2530874672 on OpenAlexafffund
Hendrik De Bie, Vincent X. Genest, Wouter van de Vijver, Luc Vinet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersVlaamse regeringNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsMathematicsAlgebra over a fieldRank (graph theory)Connection (principal bundle)Pure mathematicsFiltered algebraSymmetric algebraCellular algebraGeneralizationAlgebra representationCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A higher rank generalization of the (rank one) Racah algebra is obtained as the symmetry algebra of the Laplace–Dunkl operator associated to the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mstyle> </mml:math> root system. This algebra is also the invariance algebra of the generic superintegrable model on the n -sphere. Bases of Dunkl harmonics are constructed explicitly using a Cauchy–Kovalevskaia theorem. These bases consist of joint eigenfunctions of labelling Abelian subalgebras of the higher rank Racah algebra. A method to obtain expressions for both the connection coefficients between these bases and the action of the symmetries on these bases is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207