Developing student contemporary leadership capacity through teamwork
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because a highly skilled population is necessary for economic success, universities have a critical and growing social and economic role. Transferable skills associated with employability, such as critical thinking, lifelong learning, cultural awareness, teamwork, communication and leadership, are included in a suite of attributes which, as Barrie (2006) has described, many universities aspire to develop within their graduates. Aside from employability, there are also imperatives for universities to develop skills so that graduates may confront what has been described Barnett (2000:257) as "supercomplexity", "a world where nothing can be taken for granted, where no frame of understanding or of action can be entertained with any security" (see Su, in this volume). This is the case across individual disciplines and also in an interdisciplinary context. For example, health professionals will need to face a plethora of new challenges such as those described by Christobal et al. (2009) - for instance, the emergence of new diseases, a growing pandemic of non-communicable disorders, largely due to inappropriate lifestyles and social and educational changes as well as global information technology in a consumerist environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it