Modelling and analysis of sputter deposited ZrN coating by CFD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present work is to investigate the effect of various sputtering parameters such as velocity, mass flow rate on velocity profiles, pressure profiles, density profiles and concentration distribution of the process gases (argon and nitrogen) of zirconium nitride films deposited on glass and silica substrate by RF magnetron sputtering. A three dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study has been carried out using Fluent-ANSYS commercial code to visualize the mixing behavior of process gases inside the deposition chamber. The results show that the location of gas inlet port has a greater influence on gas distribution inside the chamber where reactive gas will form coating. By having this information, one can able to modify the reactor geometry and gas flow openings along with its positions for better gas flow over the substrate which in turns gives an indirect indication of coating from the composition point of view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it