Sanierung von Brückenfahrbahnen und Gehwegen mit Stahl‐Kunststoff‐Verbundbauteilen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In 2005 wurde auf Veranlassung des Bundesverkehrsministeriums das Sandwich Plate System (SPS) für den Einsatz an Fahrbahnen im Brückenbau in Deutschland an einem Pilotprojekt qualifiziert. Fünf Jahre vorher wurde diese 1998 patentierte Technologie durch Kontakte zwischen der RWTH Aachen und der Carleton University in Ottawa, Kanada, in Deutschland bekannt und wissenschaftlich untersucht. Für das Pilotprojekt wurde die Verstärkung der orthotropen Fahrbahnplatte einer Autobahnbrücke der A57 bei Krefeld ausgewählt. Die aus den 1960er Jahren stammende stählerne Fahrbahnplatte des Überbaus erhielt eine Fahrbahnverstärkung aus SPS‐Overlay. Mit dieser Aktion des Bundesverkehrsministeriums wurde der Start für die baupraktischen Einsätze dieser neuen, innovativen Tragstruktur gelegt. Nun, mehr als zehn Jahre nach dem Pilotprojekt, werden in diesem Bericht die mittlerweile erfolgten Entwicklungen dargestellt und aktuelle Anwendungen der 22 Jahre alten Grundidee aufgezeigt. Reconstruction of bridge decks and walkways by using Steel‐Elastomer‐Compound Components. On the initiative of the German Federal Ministry of Transport in 2005, the Sandwich Plate System has been qualified for the use on roadways in bridge construction in Germany on a pilot project. Two years before this 1998 patented technology was known in Germany by contacts between the RWTH Aachen and the Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and in the following scientifically examined. For the pilot project, the strengthening of an orthotropic carriageway of a motorway bridge of the A57 near Krefeld was selected. As a native of the 1960s, the steel slab of the bridge superstructure got roadway reinforcement by SPS Overlay. With this action by the Federal Ministry of Transport, the start of the practical building operations of this innovative new support structure was done. Now, more than ten years after the pilot project, present developments and current applications of the 22‐year‐old basic idea are highlighted in the report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".