MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2531168197

Arte actual de Québec en la Ciudad de México : Art actuel de Québec dans la ville de Mexico

2001· article· fr· W2531168197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Victor Muñoz

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotographic and Visual Arts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

se ha desdibujado.Hace cien anos contaba con 350 mil habitantes en una superficie de 27.14 km 2 .La expansion de la mancha urbana de la ciudad durante el siglo XX, pero sobre todo en la segunda mitad, desbordô su territorio politico llamado Distrito Federal.Actualmente.la mancha urbana total tiene una superficie de 1,325 km 2 y una poblaciôn de 19 millones de habitantes.Se encuentra en un territorio que los especialistas han denominado Zona Metropolitana del Valle de Mexico que incluye parte del Distrito Federal y parte de 25 municipios conurbados.Esta mancha urbana, como todas, tiene una forma irregular orgânica, como si fuera un liquido goteado sobre una superficie absorbente.Los principales centros culturales se encuentran en la zona céntrica de la urbe y todos dentro del Distrito Federal.Suman 33, y de ellos, 18 estân dedicados las artes plâsticas y visuales.El arte actual se exhibe de manera ocasional en 7 de ellos.En otros 7 se hace en forma sistemâtica.En très recintos de este ultimo grupo se exhibiô.del 28 de marzo al 29 de abril de 2001, la muestra Latinos del Norte/arte actual y altemativo de la ciudad de Québec: Ex

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)→Same topicPhotographic and Visual Arts→French-language works237,207→