La restauration écologique comme nouveau paradigme d’aménagement ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que les politiques aménagistes aient permis d’améliorer la maîtrise globale des fleuves, elles ont également généré de nombreuses perturbations et altérations. Aujourd’hui, la restauration des cours d’eau fait l’objet de nouvelles expérimentations. Dans le sud-ouest de la France, sur le fleuve Garonne et dans l’estuaire de la Gironde, elles se traduisent notamment par des remises en eau des marais, liées au passage de tempêtes (dynamique de dépoldérisation). Plus en amont, dans la moyenne Garonne toulousaine, les réflexions en cours concernent la réouverture de bras morts ou la création de zones d’expansion de crues. Nous proposons d’examiner l’émergence de ce nouveau paradigme, dans une perspective pluridisciplinaire, par une évaluation géohistorique, géochimique, écologique et sociologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".