Toll-like Receptor 2 Regulates Nerve Growth Factor Synthesis via NF-κB Signaling in Human Intervertebral Disc Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Intervertebral disc degeneration is a leading cause of chronic low back pain (LBP), but how degeneration contributes to LBP is poorly understood. Nerve growth factor (NGF) levels increase during disc degeneration and evidence suggests NGF promotes disc innervation, neuronal sensitization and low back pain, making NGF a possible therapeutic target. However, current anti-NGF therapeutics have limited efficacy and safety concerns. Mechanisms leading to increased NGF in the disc are poorly understood and the molecular signaling mechanisms regulating NGF in inflammatory mediator rich environments, such as a degenerating disc, are unknown. During degeneration, proteoglycans and extra-cellular matrix (ECM) proteins are degraded and fragmented. ECM fragments can act as endogenous danger signal ligands for toll-like receptors (TLR). TLR activation induces cytokine and chemokine expression, and could thus regulate expression of inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β or TNFα, during disc degeneration. NGF is often increased in environments with elevated levels of inflammatory mediators. Therefore, we hypothesized that TLR activation in the disc induces NGF expression. Materials and Methods Non-degenerate human intervertebral discs from organ donors without a history of low back pain were collected for cell isolation. NP and AF tissues were separated and enzymatically digested. Cells were treated with IL-1β (control), peptidoglycan (PGN, TLR2 agonist) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS, TLR4 agonist). Neutralizing antibodies against TLR2 were used to prevent TLR2 activation. Activated cell-signaling pathways following IL-1β and PGN treatment were evaluated by western blot and immunofluorescence. Small molecule inhibitors blocking p38 MAPK (SB203580) and NF-κB (BMS-345541) activity were added to cell cultures in combination with IL-1β and PGN. NGF gene expression was evaluated by qRT-PCR after 6, 12 and 24 hours, and NGF protein levels were examined by western blot and ELISA after 48 hours. Results TLR 2 activation significantly increased NGF gene expression in NP and AF cells following 6, 12 and 24 hours of treatment, while TLR 4 activation had little effect on NGF expression. TLR 2 activation significantly increased NGF protein secretion after 48 hours in NP and AF cells while TLR 4 activation did not increase NGF protein levels. TLR 2 neutralization with antibodies showed that TLR 2 is required for PGN induced NGF expression. TLR 2 activation of the p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, JNK and NF-κB signaling pathways was analyzed using phosphorylation specific antibodies. TLR activation increased p38 MAPK, ERK1/2 and p65 (NF- κB pathway) phosphorylation in disc cells compared with untreated cells. Furthermore, immunofluorescence found that TLR activation induces p65 translation to the nucleus, indicative of NF-κB signaling. Inhibiting NF-κB signaling decreased TLR 2 induced NGF expression. Conclusion This study found that TLR 2 activation directly regulates NGF expression via NF-κB signaling in human intervertebral disc cells. These findings represent a novel regulatory mechanism of NGF in the IVD. In the central nervous system NF-κB distinct signaling pathways regulate NGF. Therefore, these finding may provide therapeutic strategies to target NGF and low back pain without affecting the central nervous system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".