MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531464513

Socio-Legal Issues Affecting the Use of Digital Signatures for Secure E-commerce Transactions: A Caribbean Perspective

2004· article· en· W2531464513 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard M. Escalante

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetLegislationDeveloping countryInternet privacyAuthentication (law)Perspective (graphical)BusinessComputer securityWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawEconomic growthEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the socio-legal issues surrounding the role of digital signatures as an internet technology for secure e-commerce transactions in Caribbean developing countries. It highlights the view that as internet technologies become more affordable in developing countries, the societal changes surrounding digital signatures will be even greater than that of developed countries. Further, the increasing use of internet technology in electronic transactions raises the issue of the legality of these transactions. As in similar developing countries, socio-legal issues in the Caribbean Region will include perception, privacy and authentication, trust and confidence, psychology and culture, internet access and cost, and increased security. Given the absence of adequate legislation on digital signatures in Caribbean countries, the article concludes that for this technology to meet the need for user confidence in secure e-commerce transactions, an information infrastructure must first be put in place before users in Caribbean developing countries can actively engage in secure e-commerce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207