MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2531494992

IAC-04-IAF-B.3.08 512x3 PIXEL UNCOOLED FPA FOR THERMAL INFRARED PUSHBROOM IMAGING

2008· article· en· W2531494992 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Chevalier, C. Alain, Alain Bergeron, Hubert Jerominek, Le Thi Hong Phong, Wanping Zheng, Jean‐Loup Bézy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobolometerPixelCardinal pointOffset (computer science)InfraredRemote sensingDetectorDot pitchSatelliteComputer scienceOpticsBolometerPhysicsGeologyAstronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are an increasing number of planned earth and planetary observation missions incorporating thermal infrared imaging instruments. The integration of uncooled microbolometer technology into these instruments provides size, mass, and power consumption advantages that are beneficial for small satellite missions and crucial to micro and nano-satellite missions. INO and CSA have developed a unique and versatile Canadian microbolometer technology for satellite missions. This technology has recently been applied to the development of an uncooled focal plane array designed to meet the specific needs of satellite-based thermal infrared imaging. The array consists of three parallel rows of 512 pixels on a 39 µm pitch. Each pixel includes active and reference detectors for on-chip pixel offset correction and increased immunity to die temperature drift. The readout electronics integrates each pixel in parallel, cancels its own offset and low frequency noise and provides 14-bit digital output. A compact circuit card assembly for operating and collecting data with the 512x3 pixel FPA has been designed and fabricated. It fits in an envelope 75mm x 75mm x 50mm and has a power consumption of 3.75 W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→