MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531556462 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.351

Bayesian Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equation Models via Laplace Approximation

2016· article· en· W2531556462 on OpenAlex
Hadiseh Karimi, Kimberley B. McAuley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaplace's methodLaplace transformApplied mathematicsNonlinear systemBayesian probabilityStochastic differential equationMathematicsContinuous stirred-tank reactorEstimation theoryBayes estimatorNoise (video)Mathematical optimizationDifferential equationAlgorithmComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Bayesian algorithm is developed for estimating measurement noise variances, disturbance intensities and model parameters in nonlinear stochastic differential equation (SDE) models of interest to chemical engineers. The proposed Bayesian algorithm uses prior knowledge about parameters and builds on the Laplace Approximation Maximum Likelihood Estimation (LAMLE) algorithm (Karimi and McAuley, 2014). The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is compared with LAMLE using a nonlinear continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) model. Parameter estimation using 2000 simulated datasets reveals that the proposed method provides more precise and less biased estimates, especially for small data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it