MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531671185 · doi:10.1017/etds.2018.82

Rigidity, universality, and hyperbolicity of renormalization for critical circle maps with non-integer exponents

2018· preprint· en· W2531671185 on OpenAlex
Igors Gorbovickis, Michael Yampolsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueErgodic Theory and Dynamical Systems · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniversality (dynamical systems)RenormalizationBounded functionMathematicsCritical exponentRenormalization groupRigidity (electromagnetism)ExponentInteger (computer science)Mathematical physicsCombinatoricsPhysicsMathematical analysisGeometryQuantum mechanicsScaling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct a renormalization operator which acts on analytic circle maps whose critical exponent $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ is not necessarily an odd integer $2n+1$ , $n\in \mathbb{N}$ . When $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=2n+1$ , our definition generalizes cylinder renormalization of analytic critical circle maps by Yampolsky [Hyperbolicity of renormalization of critical circle maps. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 96 (2002), 1–41]. In the case when $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ is close to an odd integer, we prove hyperbolicity of renormalization for maps of bounded type. We use it to prove universality and $C^{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$ -rigidity for such maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it