Ceramic vessels of the wendat confederacy : Indicators of tribal affiliation or mobile clans?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article compare des types de recipients en ceramique provenant de 21 collections de differents sites et representant divers ensembles geographiques et divisions taxonomiques des Wendats (Hurons) entre les XVieme et XVIIieme siecles. Comme ces donnees proviennent de rapports deja publies, l'analyse porte par necessite sur les types de ceramiques plutot que sur les attributs. Cela s'est avere opportun, puisque se trouvait ainsi quantifiee et precisee la proportion variable de ceramiques etrangeres (non Wendates) de chaque collection. Le fait que le quart, voire la moitie, des recipients de certaines collections soit d'origine etrangere indique que les comparaisons traditionnelles des assemblages trouves sur differents sites auraient tendance a masquer les relations locales. En se concentrant exclusivement sur les ceramiques wendates, il a ete possible de constater l'homogeneite de la decoration des ceramiques des XVieme et XVIieme siecles, laquelle, avec l'apport de temoignages tires de documents historiques et d'autres temoignages archeologiques, revelerait la mobilite de sous-groupes entre villages, situation qui ne s'est apparemment pas perpetuee au XVIIieme siecle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".