MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531765696 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12622

Low Ki67/high ATM protein expression in malignant tumors predicts favorable prognosis in a retrospective study of early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer

2016· article· en· W2531765696 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xiaolan Feng, Haocheng Li, Elizabeth Kornaga, Michelle L. Dean, Susan P. Lees‐Miller, Karl Riabowol, Anthony M. Magliocco, Don Morris, Peter H. Watson, Emeka K. Enwere, Gwyn Bebb, Alexander Paterson

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerImmunohistochemistryMedicineTissue microarrayStage (stratigraphy)Lymph nodeOncologyInternal medicineSurvival analysisPathologyHormone receptorLymphCancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Xiaolan Feng 1,2,3 , Haocheng Li 3,4 , Elizabeth N. Kornaga 5,6 , Michelle Dean 5,6 , Susan P. Lees-Miller 7 , Karl Riabowol 7 , Anthony M. Magliocco 8 , Don Morris 3,6 , Peter H. Watson 9 , Emeka K. Enwere 5,6 , Gwyn Bebb 3,6 and Alexander Paterson 3 1 Department of Oncology, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 2 Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 3 Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 4 Department of Community Health Science, TRW Building, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 5 Functional Tissue Imaging Unit, Translational Research Laboratory, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 6 Translational Research Laboratory, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 7 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Health Science Building, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada 8 Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA 9 Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Correspondence to: Xiaolan Feng, email: // Keywords : ATM, Ki67, early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer, automated quantitative immunofluorescence analysis, disease specific overall survival Received : August 26, 2016 Accepted : October 05, 2016 Published : October 12, 2016 Abstract Introduction: This study was designed to investigate the combined influence of ATM and Ki67 on clinical outcome in early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer (ES-HPBC), particularly in patients with smaller tumors (< 4 cm) and fewer than four positive lymph nodes. Methods: 532 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of resected primary breast tumors were used to construct a tissue microarray. Samples from 297 patients were suitable for final statistical analysis. We detected ATM and Ki67 proteins using fluorescence and brightfield immunohistochemistry respectively, and quantified their expression with digital image analysis. Data on expression levels were subsequently correlated with clinical outcome. Results: Remarkably, ATM expression was useful to stratify the low Ki67 group into subgroups with better or poorer prognosis. Specifically, in the low Ki67 subgroup defined as having smaller tumors and no positive nodes, patients with high ATM expression showed better outcome than those with low ATM, with estimated survival rates of 96% and 89% respectively at 15 years follow up ( p = 0.04). Similarly, low-Ki67 patients with smaller tumors, 1-3 positive nodes and high ATM also had significantly better outcomes than their low ATM counterparts, with estimated survival rates of 88% and 46% respectively ( p = 0.03) at 15 years follow up. Multivariable analysis indicated that the combination of high ATM and low Ki67 is prognostic of improved survival, independent of tumor size, grade, and lymph node status ( p = 0.02). Conclusions: These data suggest that the prognostic value of Ki67 can be improved by analyzing ATM expression in ES-HPBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesFrench-language works237,207