MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531864430 · doi:10.11159/cdsr16.112

Echo Cancellation: A Novel Adaptive Kalman Filter-Based Scheme

2016· article· en· W2531864430 on OpenAlexaff
R. Doraiswami, Lahouari Cheded

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcho (communications protocol)WaveformComputer scienceNoise (video)ResidualAlgorithmKalman filterAdaptive filterNoise reductionSIGNAL (programming language)Filter (signal processing)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel adaptive echo cancellation scheme, using an accurate and reliable two-stage identification scheme and an adaptive Kalman filter (KF), is proposed.The novel scheme estimates a desired waveform from the received signal which is corrupted by an undesired echo and noise.It is assumed that the desired waveform and the echo are uncorrelated with each other, and that the reference waveform is highly correlated with the echo.Further, the reference waveform and echo are related by a rational transfer function and are assumed to be measureable.An accurate and reliable model of the echo is identified from the received signal using a proposed novel two-stage identification scheme.This two-stage scheme is used to identify accurately and reliably the model relating the reference and actual echo waveforms using least squares and model order reduction.It is implemented in the frequency domain using waveform segmentation to ensure efficient computation and model reduction, signal stationarity and real-time system implementation.The identified model of the echo is then embodied into the KF which is a minimum-variance estimator that is robust to noise and disturbances and has a zero-mean, white noise residual.The performance of the KF is monitored continuously and its gain updated adaptively.If the filter's residual fails the whiteness test, the model of the echo is then re-identified and the KF adapted accordingly.The proposed scheme was successfully evaluated on simulated and real recorded speech corrupted by noise and echo.This novel scheme can be extended to areas such as beamforming

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and RoboticsSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207