MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531896660 · doi:10.24972/ijts.2012.31.2.1

Dissipative Processes in Psychology: From the Psyche to Totality

2012· article· en· W2531896660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Transpersonal Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos, Complexity, and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
KeywordsIlyaPsycheSynergetics (Haken)Dissipative systemPsychologyEpistemologyPerspective (graphical)Cognitive sciencePsychoanalysisCognitive psychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper articulates a possible framework for understanding and resolving psychopathological phenomena from the perspective of chaos theory and based on the application of Ilya Prigogine's concepts of dissipative structures and processes. Twenty-eight years in clinical practice have shown the human being to be memory-inheritance, which produces a type of "psychological DNA." The personality is thereby crystallized, generating dynamic patterns (fractals) in its interference with reality. Although necessary for living, this crystallization is imprisoning. Once the shadow of memory has been resolved and dissolved, the person achieves reorganizing and transrational processes. We develop the concepts of the emergent crisis and vortices such as sensitivity, instability and bifurcation, considering the symptom to be a trigger for healing-transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it