MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532164872

The Critique of Bourgeois Life: Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s Nora Helmer

2011· article· en· W2532164872 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ronald Ka-Chun Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBourgeoisieInterpretation (philosophy)Context (archaeology)ArtArt historyPhilosophyPoliticsHistoryLawPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Rainer Werner Fassbinder's 1973 film Helmer, an adaptation of Ibsen's A Doll's House. In this article, I first dissect the various criticisms of Fassbinder’s film in order to show the grip that the feminist interpretation has on the reception of the adapted work. I then set up the context of the film by discussing the status of bourgeois life in West Germany in the 1970s. Finally, I analyze several elements in the film that supports my interpretation: Nora Helmer is ostensibly not about femi- nism, but is rather an insightful critique of bourgeois society in that time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.019
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207