MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532418671 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1841

P3‐181: Evaluating the Relationship Between Markers of Oxidative Stress and Cognitive Performance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients

2016· article· en· W2532418671 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Adibfar, Nathan Herrmann, Graham Mazereeuw, Ana C. Andreazza, Paul Oh, Krista L. Lanctôt

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteSunnybrook Health Science CentreOccupational Cancer Research CentreHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipid peroxidationOxidative stressEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCognitionDementiaVerbal fluency testInternal medicineCognitive testCoronary artery diseaseMalondialdehydePsychologyVerbal learningAudiologyMedicineDiseasePsychiatryNeuropsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early cognitive deficits are highly prevalent and associated with increased risk for progression to dementia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Oxidative stress, particularly lipid peroxidation, represents an emerging mechanism implicated in both neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases, but its relationship with cognitive decline has yet to be examined in CAD. The objective of the present study was to determine the association between lipid peroxidation and cognitive performance in CAD patients. Cognitive performance was measured with a standardized battery of cognitive tests: verbal memory was assessed using the California Verbal Learning Test, 2 Ed; visuospatial memory using the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised; speed of processing using the Trails Making Test A and the Digit Symbol-Coding subtest of the Weschsler Adult Intelligence Scale; and executive function using the Trails Making Test B and the FAS Verbal Fluency test. Standardized Z-scores of related tests were summed to reflect performance in cognitive domains. Lipid hydroperoxides (LPH), early-stage products of oxidative damage to lipids, as well as the late-stage lipid peroxidation markers 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and 8-isoprostane (8-ISO) were measured using spectrophotometric assays from serum samples provided by study patients. Ratios ((4-HNE+8ISO)/LPH) were calculated to reflect lipid peroxidation progression. Analyses of covariance were used to look at differences in the lipid peroxidation ratio between those who were impaired (performance 1 standard deviation below mean) compared to those who were not impaired in the cognitive domains. In patients with CAD (n=84, mean age=61±9, 76.2% male, mean BMI=28.4±4.0), a higher lipid peroxidation ratio was found in those who were impaired in verbal memory (F=5.62, p=0.02), processing speed (F=5.19, p=0.03), and executive function (F=4.14, p=0.05) after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and total years of education. No such associations were observed between visuospatial memory groups (F=0.26, p=0.61). Oxidative stress, and ensuing conversion of early- to late-stage lipid peroxidation, may be an important correlate of cognitive decline in CAD. Further investigating markers of lipid peroxidation may help to better characterize the pathways underlying the subtle cognitive deficits seen in CAD and reveal potential biomarkers of etiologic and prognostic value to this cognitively at-risk patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207