Notas videográficas: o gesto altermodernista na obra "365 day project" de Jonas Mekas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo pretende analisar as imbricações entre artes visuais e linguagem cinematográfica no pensamento acerca de uma estética videográfica. Toma-se como objeto analítico o projeto “365 Day Project”, de Jonas Mekas. Partindo da afirmação do autor Philippe Dubois de que os conceitos da linguagem cinematográfica não são suficientes para problematizar as práticas videográficas, a pesquisa utiliza conceitos comuns à teoria da imagem e à filosofia da arte, especificamente os conceitos de “altermodernismo”, desenvolvido por Nicolas Bourriaud e de “gesto”, desenvolvido por Giorgio Agamben, para discutir o modo como a relação entre as obras videográficas e os dispositivos audiovisuais se torna produtora de subjetividades em um campo híbrido à linguagem do cinema e das artes visuais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".