MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532614688 · doi:10.1115/ipc2000-169

Use of Robotic Technology for Cast Iron Pipeline Repair

2000· article· en· W2532614688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingSealantPipeline transportRobotPipeline (software)Mechanical engineeringGeologyComputer scienceMining engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prior to the introduction of plastic pipe many gas utilities used cast iron to build their gas distribution network. Currently, there is approximately forty thousand kilometres of cast iron pipe in service in North America and a further two hundred thousand kilometres in Europe. Mostly found in dense urban locations, the cost of replacing these systems can be significantly high, such that extending the life of these systems is now a common strategy. The main problem has been leakage from bell and spigot joints caused by road vibration, freeze/thaw cycles of the ground, and the swelling and drying of clay soils. Repair technologies have evolved from mechanical joint clamps, to elastomeric seals, to shrink sleeves, to encapsulants and finally to anaerobics. The most advanced of these technologies involve the use of anaerobic sealants which are injected into the jute packing by drilling into the pipe bells. These sealants have been studied at Cornell University for longevity, and are predicted to withstand many years of service. The use of anaerobics has been adapted to work with robotics that allows the injection to take place from the inside of the pipeline while the gas main is in operation. This technology allows 24 joints to be sealed from a single excavation. The robot is a tethered electro-mechanical device that allows visual location of the joint, internal drilling into the jute packing, and injection of the sealant. A semi-rigid umbilical cable contains the electrical, hydraulic, and communication lines, and a unique drive mechanism that allows for remote operation and positioning. The development of this prototype technology was conducted by Engineering Services Inc. (ESI) of Toronto at the request of Enbridge Consumers Gas and was co-funded by Consolidated Edison of New York. Over 2000 joints have been successfully sealed in the last two years and the system is expected to be commercially available within the next year. Internal robotic repair of live mains is an industry first and has the potential to significantly reduce both costs and disruption of road excavations in urban areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207