MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532734653 · doi:10.1109/spca.2006.297458

Agent-Based Service-Oriented Computing and Applications

2006· article· en· W2532734653 on OpenAlexaff
Weiming Shen, Hamada Ghenniwa, Yinsheng Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceServices computingWeb serviceWS-I Basic ProfileService-oriented architectureWS-PolicyWorld Wide WebInteroperabilitySOAPWeb modelingSoftware engineeringWeb developmentWeb application securityWeb intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. Service-oriented computing (SOC) is considered as a new computing paradigm after the object-oriented computing paradigm. It utilizes services as fundamental elements for applications/solutions. Services are autonomous platform-independent computational elements that can be described, published, discovered, orchestrated and programmed using XML for the purpose of developing massively distributed interoperable applications. Web services technology is part of the SOC paradigm and can be considered as an implementation of the SOC model. Web services are featured with application, platform and provider independence. They provide an appropriate approach for building open large-scale application environments. In such environments, services are not treated as isolated and one-time affairs but rather as elements of an interactive, dynamic and collaborative architecture. Service collaboration within or across environments is modelled in terms of supported transactions or processes that are subject to norms or protocols specified for certain business domains. Services are thereby orchestrated vertically within one environment, or horizontally across multiple environments. As a result, an individual environment streamlines services in terms of internal transactions while restrains its function scope to be highly specific to the targeted user group. Multiple environments collaborate in order to extend their business chains. Web services have been supported by major IT vendors through their commercial platforms such as Microsoft's .NET and SUN's J2EE. Web services have had quick evolution and broad acceptance. However, there are still a number of issues that limit the wide applications of Web services in industry. Current Web services technologies lack semantic description, generic service model, dynamic composition, and flexible cooperation strategies. Software agents have been proved to handle sophisticated interaction patterns. Agent-orientation is an appropriate design paradigm to enable automatic and dynamic collaborations, especially for e-Business systems with complex and distributed transactions. In services realization, software agents are very essential for the provision of a focused and cohesive set of active capabilities. Therefore, we envision a combination of agent and Web services technologies and strongly believe that we are on the right track towards an evolution of current SOC paradigm. Software agents can be one of the essential evolvements of Web services in that they are functional entities, instead of simple interaction delegations or communication proxies. The idea is to exploit agents' capabilities of proactive interactions to enhance Web services' behaviours. With such a computing paradigm, software components, each representing both a service and an agent, cooperatively or competitively interact to provide unified services in a specified environment, such as brokering, pricing and negotiation in an e-marketplace, as well as cross-enterprise environments, such as integration and cooperation in a virtual enterprise. We envision a Web service-based environment as a collection of economically motivated agent-based Web services. Software agents are implemented as services with different functionalities and roles. In fact, the dynamic agent-based behaviour model plus the Web service-based interoperable protocols can generate a flexible, reconfigurable and coordinated approach to perform business process management both across enterprises and within an enterprise. We have developed an agent-based service-oriented system architecture for manufacturing enterprise collaboration. In this system, each enterprise provides a number of Web services registered in a UDDI repository. The Web services are implemented by the AWS (agent-based Web services) technology with a built-in agent core. So, enterprises are equipped with negotiation ability with upper mediating agents. Moreover, upper mediating agents are also implemented as a network of AWSs on the Internet. The unification of software agents and Web services can be proposed at both the design level and the implementation level. At the design level, we encapsulate Web services into agent models so that each agent represents a service in its action and relation to the environment. In this sense, we treat a Web service as a semi-autonomous agent. On the other hand, Web services technologies are used to implement the external behaviours of software agents. Therefore, agents can be used to build high-level models with flexible interaction patterns, while Web services are more suitable for solving interoperability problems among heterogeneous applications across enterprises. At the implementation level, UDDI, WSDL and SOAP provide such capacities as discovery, deployment and communication, while specifications such as BPEL4WS provide service composition and process enactment. A software prototype system has been implemented for inter-enterprise manufacturing resource sharing. It demonstrates how the proposed agent-based service-oriented integration architecture can be used to establish a collaborative environment that provides dynamic resource scheduling services

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207