MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532790210 · doi:10.1002/chem.201604473

Preparation of an <sup>18</sup>F‐Labeled Hydrocyanine Dye as a Multimodal Probe for Reactive Oxygen Species

2016· article· en· W2532790210 on OpenAlexafffund
Salma Al‐Karmi, Silvia A. Albu, Alyssa Vito, Nancy Janzen, Shannon Czorny, Laura Banevicius, Max Nanao, Jon Zubieta, Alfredo Capretta, John F. Valliant

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsCentre for Probe Development and CommercializationMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCyanineBiodistributionReactive oxygen speciesChemistryRadicalPositron emission tomographyIn vivoOxygenChemiluminescencePreclinical imagingPhotochemistryRadiochemistryFluorescenceIn vitroNuclear medicineOrganic chemistryBiochemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrocyanine dyes are sensitive “turn‐on” type optical probes that can detect reactive oxygen species (ROS). We have developed a method to prepare an 18 F‐labeled hydrocyanine dye as a multi‐modal PET and optical “turn‐on” probe. A commercially available near infrared (NIR) dye was modified with a fluorinated prosthetic group that did not alter its ROS sensing properties in the presence of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals. The 18 F‐labeled analogue was produced using a single‐step terminal fluorination procedure. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and quantitative in vivo biodistribution studies indicated this novel probe had remarkably different pharmacokinetics compared to the oxidized cyanine analogue. The chemistry reported enables the use of quantitative and dynamic PET imaging for the in vivo study of hydrocyanine dyes as ROS probes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207