MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532917800 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2009.5414738

Fault tolerant control of electric power steering using H-infinity filter-simulation study

2009· article· en· W2532917800 on OpenAlexaff
Smitha Cholakkal, Xiang Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorqueControl theory (sociology)Direct torque controlPower steeringEstimatorTorsion (gastropod)Torsion springAutomotive engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceInduction motorElectrical engineeringControl (management)PhysicsMathematicsVoltageMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a physical system, faults could occur time to time and, for safety purpose, measures have to be implemented to keep the physical system continuously operating if a fault does not result in global shut-down. In this paper, a Fault tolerant Control (FTC) design is proposed for the electric power steering (EPS) system in an automobile to address the case of electric connection fault incurred in the torsion bar torque sensor. In particular, the total torque that acts on the assisting motor shaft is the sum of the torsion bar torque and road reaction torque. An H¿filter is designed to estimate the total torque on the motor shaft and the road reaction torque can be calculated out using the available signals from the vehicle stability system. The torque sensor signal can then be deduced and used to replace the torsion bar sensor signal when the electric connection is broken. It is claimed that the proposed robust filter design yields huge advantage over a Luenberger type estimator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207