MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533005157 · doi:10.1109/tdc.2004.1432394

Impacts of FACTS controllers on damping power systems low frequency electromechanical oscillations

2005· article· en· W2533005157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatic VAR compensatorControl theory (sociology)ThyristorElectric power systemTransmission lineFlexible AC transmission systemElectric power transmissionBifurcationSeries (stratigraphy)Power (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsControl (management)Nonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a study comparing the effects of four flexible ac transmission systems (FACTS) controllers, the static var compensator (SVC), the static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), the thyristor controlled series compensator (TCSC) and the static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) on power systems small-signal angle stability. This investigation is carried out for a single generator connected to an infinite bus via a loss-less transmission line. The study is based on the investigation of the critical eigenvalues of the power system linearized model in the framework of the dynamic bifurcation theory. The presented simulation results allow a comparative analysis of the effects of these four controllers and reveal that the SSSC exhibits the best effectiveness on damping power systems low frequency electromechanical oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207