MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533224169 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2016.2621108

Magnetically Levitated Rotary Table With Six Degrees of Freedom

2016· article· en· W2533224169 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Canadian institutionsSeaStar Solutions (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotary encoderCapacitive sensingTable (database)AmplifierMagnetAcousticsPhysicsControl theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringEncoderComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a six-degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated rotary table for fine positioning. The table utilizes a moving magnet motor configuration with the Halbach arrays mounted around the perimeter of the table. The actuation forces are achieved by using the Lorentz force, where the coils are made using printed circuit board technology. By using four three-phase amplifiers, a total of eight independently controlled forces are produced. Closed-loop motion control is achieved by using four optical encoders and four capacitive sensors. Movement is unlimited rotating around the Z-axis and limited in the additional three linear (X , Y, Z) axes and two rotary axes around X and Y , respectively. The table has been manufactured and experimentally demonstrated to deliver submicrometer accuracy in precision micromachining application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it