Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robert Williams (Artist, University of Cumbria) took part in a panel discussion involving participants: Mark Dion (Artist, New York), Dirk Syndram (Director Grünes Gewölbe, Dresden), Matthias Flügge (Rektor HfBK Dresden), Robert Felfde (Art Historian, University of Hamburg), Rosamond Purcell (Artist), Ulrike Grossgarth (HfBK Dresden), Nadine Engel (Art Historian, Geneva), Donna Roberts (Art Historian, Helsinki), Jane Wildgoose (Artist), Stephan Köhler (Curator, Hamburg & West Africa), Verena Kuni (Scholar for Visual Culture, Frankfürt am Main), Helen Gregory (PhD Candidate, University of Western Ontario), Marion Endt-Jones (Art Historian, Manchester University), Nike Bätzner (Art Historian, Kunsthochschule, Halle), Gabriele Beßler (Curator, Stuttgart/Köln) and Sarah Wade (PhD Candidate, UCL).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".