MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2533290801 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.971.971

Fibrinolytic Agents for Restoration of Central Venous Catheter Patency: A Systematic Review.

2007· article· en· W2533290801 on OpenAlexaff
Myra Wang, Yoan K. Kagoma, Wendy Lim, Catherine M. Clase, Mark Crowther

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReteplaseUrokinaseCatheterHemodialysisSurgeryFibrinolytic agentThrombolysisAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialHemodialysis CatheterThrombolytic drugInternal medicineTissue plasminogen activator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction. Thrombolytic agents are frequently used as an aid to restore catheter patency despite limited evidence supporting their use. We therefore conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of tPA (alteplase) and reteplase in restoring catheter patency. Methods. We searched MEDLINE (1999 to May Week 3 2007) and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (Second Quarter 2007) and performed a manual search for further studies. Studies published before 1999 were excluded since they have been previously reviewed; furthermore, most such studies used urokinase, which is no longer used to restore catheter patency in North America. Studies were included if they described the efficacy of alteplase or reteplase in restoring patency of central venous catheters (either for hemodialysis or infusional treatment) and where more than 5 thrombotic episodes were reported. This latter exclusion criteria was used to reduce the likelihood of bias likely to be found in very small case series. Two independent researchers abstracted total thrombolytic dose administered, dwell times, catheter patency rates and adverse event (including bleeding rates). For purposes of comparison, dwell times were stratified as ≤ 30 minutes and 30 to 120 minutes. Results. 25 articles were identified in the initial search, of which 17 met one or more exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 8 studies, 7 evaluated central venous catheters used for intravenous infusions and 1 study evaluated occluded hemodialysis catheters. Except for 1 randomized trial comparing thrombolytic agents to placebo in non-hemodialysis patients, all studies described uncontrolled cohorts or case series. The mean study size was 214 patients (range 6–995). At doses of 0.5–2.5 mg of alteplase, the range of catheter patency rates at dwell times of ≤ 30 minutes and 30 to 120 minutes were 52–54% (1301 total uses) and 69–91% (1466 total uses) respectively. In comparison when used with a ≤ 30 minute dwell time, reteplase was reported to restore catheter patency in 67–73% cases (154 total uses). In all reports bleeding complications attributed to thrombolytic therapy were uncommon. Conclusion. Our review suggests that the installation of alteplase or reteplase will restore catheter patency in more than 50% of cases when used with a dwell time of at least 30 minutes. Longer dwell times appear to increase patency rates. Reteplase may be more effective than alteplase, although this observation should be validated in an adequately powered clinical trial. Overall, although modern thrombolytic agents appear to provide catheter patency in the majority of patients, the evidence supporting their use is of low quality and is not based on the results of randomized trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0100.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→